Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2006No. 0508-68657; A129859PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Appellant appeals an order of involuntary civil commitment, arguing that the record is insufficient to support a finding by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder that renders him a danger to himself or others or unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On de novo review, State v. Hitt, 179 Or App 563, 565, 41 P3d 434 (2002), we reverse.

The evidence admitted into the record is limited. Appellant appeared for a civil commitment hearing. Two mental health examiners were present. The court admitted into evidence a “Notice of Treatment Prior to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. A. M.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. M. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API