Legal Opinion
State v. Ayala
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 15, 1999No. C980025MC; CA A101430PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment adjudicating her to be a mentally ill person and committing her to the Mental Health Division. ORS 426.130(1)(b)(C). The trial court committed appellant because her disorder made her unable to provide for her basic needs, and she was not receiving the care necessary for health and safety. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(B). On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we reverse.
Appellant is a 25-year-old female who suffers from schizoaffective disorder. She was previously committed and is required to take medications for her disorder. At the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Bend Millwork Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.