Legal Opinion
Matter of Christofferson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 25, 1980No. 80-52, CA 17721PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.
Petitioner in this involuntary civil commitment proceedings contends that the trial court erred in finding him a mentally ill person within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2) and committing him to the Mental Health Division.
ORS 426.005(2) provides:
"As used in ORS 426.005 to 426.390, unless the context requires otherwise:
sis ❖
"(2) 'Mentally ill person’ means a person who, because of a mental disorder, is either:
"(a) Dangerous to himself or others; or
"(b) Unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for his health or safety.”
Defense counsel conceded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Matter of ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. RathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. SeaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.