Legal Opinion

Matter of Christofferson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1980No. 80-52, CA 17721PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.

Petitioner in this involuntary civil commitment proceedings contends that the trial court erred in finding him a mentally ill person within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2) and committing him to the Mental Health Division.

ORS 426.005(2) provides:

"As used in ORS 426.005 to 426.390, unless the context requires otherwise:

sis ❖

"(2) 'Mentally ill person’ means a person who, because of a mental disorder, is either:
"(a) Dangerous to himself or others; or
"(b) Unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for his health or safety.”

Defense counsel conceded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Matter of ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. RathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. SeaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API