State v. S. R. J.

I agree with the majority opinion’s conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s commitment on the ground that she was a danger to others at the *759time of commitment. I disagree, however, with its conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to support appellant’s commitment on the ground that she was a danger to self.

The scope of the disagreement is narrow. We agree that the evidence would support a finding that, at the time of the hearing, appellant, as a result of her mental disorder, would again “engage in conduct similar” to that in which she had engaged four months…