State v. Jacobson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Appellant challenges an order finding him to be a mentally ill person. ORS 426.130(1)(b). We review de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and affirm.
Appellant is 59 years old. He has no history of prior civil commitment. In November 1995, appellant suffered a seizure at the Portland airport and was taken to the hospital. There he was placed on a two-physician ‘bold,” in part because he “cannot walk without assistance [1] but thinks he can, [has a] high risk of hip fracture, [and] cannot cooperate [with] medical treatment.”
A medical investigator evaluated appellant and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. FurnishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. LeHuquetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. GjerdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.