Legal Opinion

State v. He Quan Chan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

defendant was tried and convicted of one of the crimes defined by Section 8645, Or. L., as amended by Chapter 27, Laws of 1923. The specific, charge was the unlawful possession of morphine. Said section, as amended, provides that:

“It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation * * to have in his or their possession any * * morphine # * or any of the salts, derivatives or compounds of the foregoing substances or any preparation or compound contained in or containing any of the foregoing substances or their salts, derivatives or compounds, excepting upon the written order or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. GauntOregon Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Canales-Robles v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. BurroughsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. GilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API