Legal Opinion

State v. Gaunt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1885PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Klamath County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWaldo, C. J.

The defendant was accused by the grand jury of Klamath County of selling spirituous liquors without a license, contrary to the statute in such cases made and provided. The case was argued here on the defend-4 ant’s demurrer to the indictment. The act, contrary to the provisions of which the defendant is alleged to have sold, is the act of February 17,1885, entitled, “An act to regulate the sale of spirituous liquors.” The act provided no penalty. Sections 726 and 753 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were, however, both relied on to sustain the conviction and sentence.

*116The act of February 17,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Health Department v. . KnollNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. King v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ferrett v. AtwillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
  4. Berry v. RipleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804
  5. Jones v. EstisNew York Supreme Court · 1807

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Multnomah County Fair Ass'n v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. AyersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. AusplundOregon Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API