Legal Opinion
State v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 12, 1971No. C-57420PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant, having waived a jury, was convicted by the court of selling a dangerous drug (methamphetamine). ORS 475.100. He appeals.
He contends that methamphetamine was not properly designated a dangerous drug by the Drug Advisory Council. The principal point relied on is that the Drug Advisory Council did not give notice of intent to hold a public hearing before designating methamphetamine to be a dangerous drug, as required by ORS 183.330 (3) of the Administrative Procedures Act. A brief examination of the statutory scheme is necessary to a resolution of the problem.
The State Board of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicoli v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Sidney B. Rowlette and Robert Vecelli, A/K/A Robert Savio, United States of America v. Robert Vecelli, A/K/A Robert SavioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Reed v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ReamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cornelius v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.