Legal Opinion

State v. Burroughs

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant was accused of practicing medicine without a license. The charging part of the indictment reads:

“The said Albert 0. Burroughs, on the first day of March, A. D., 1928, in the county of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there, unlawfully and willfully practice medicine, without having first obtained a license from the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Oregon entitling him to so practice, and did then and there unlawfully, for a compensation directly or indirectly receive (d), or to be received, offer and undertake to prescribe, give and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. HumphreyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. RandolphOregon Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. TollefsonOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. PearlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API