Legal Opinion

State v. Gilson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of fornication which is defined by Section 2077, Or. L., as follows: “If any male person over the age of eighteen years shall, in such manner as does not make the act rape, carnally know any female person of previous chaste and moral character, who is over the age of sixteen years and under the age of eighteen years, and is not his lawful wife, such male person shall be deemed guilty of fornication, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished,” etc.

To this indictment the defendant entered a plea of not guilty. He was tried, convicted and sentenced…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Price v. StipekMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. AtwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. OfodrinwaOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. EyleOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API