Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez-Rubio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 7, 1995No. 93CR-1865; CA A82384PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for unlawful possession of a machine gun. ORS 166.272. We reverse.

Police lawfully searched defendant’s home and seized several weapons. Later, the state charged him with unlawful possession of a machine gun. At trial, there was evidence that one of the weapons the police seized was a machine gun. See ORS 166.210(5). After the state rested, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal. He argued that one element of the crime of unlawful possession of a machine gun is that the gun was not registered as required under federal law, and that the state had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. People v. ReedColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. WrisleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. People v. WhaleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API