Legal Opinion

Blanco v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1950No. 12508PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an o'rder which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A.. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Turnbull v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. Cashion v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. James A. Williams v. John E. Peters and Chester E. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Monge v. SmythCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Newman v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API