Legal Opinion

Monge v. Smyth

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1952No. Mo. 13508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

On July 5, 1951, appellant, Bartolomeo Monge, commenced a civil action against appellee, James G. Smyth, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of California, by filing a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

On September 6, 1951, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. There was no motion to dismiss the action. See Form 19 of the Appendix of Forms following Rule 86 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

On October 15, 1951, the District Court entered an order which granted the motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamson Co. v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  2. Stradford v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Turnbull v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Blanco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. Monge v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Bartolomeo Monge v. James G. Smyth, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Fern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API