James A. Williams v. John E. Peters and Chester E. Strand
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s complaint “for failing to state a cause of action.” Williams’ complaint alleged that defendants Peters and Strand, when called to testify in a certain criminal prosecution against him, each gave false and perjured testimony against Williams, thus bringing about his conviction.
The defendant Strand moved for summary judgment. To his order denying that motion, 1 the court added the order dismissing the complaint, from which appeal is now sought.
This court has frequently held that an order dismissing a complaint, without dismissing the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Tom We Shung v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Turnbull v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- John Marshall v. Grant Sawyer, as Governor of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. American International Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Dworkin v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- James A. Williams v. Pierce County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.