Turnbull v. Cyr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss a complaint, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d ,969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians ex. rel. U. S. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Renard v. Kirkeby HotelsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- James A. Williams v. John E. Peters and Chester E. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- W. E. Richardson v. United States of America and Don's Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.