Legal Opinion
Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1950No. 12,360PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
These two appeals were taken in an action brought against appellee on January 16, 1947, to enforce causes of action, hereafter called claims, for unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor. Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. The claims sought to be enforced were those of Glenn O. Prickett, H. F. Winans, S. E. Whitney, Luther M. Walters, Samuel D. Tinker, Frank Hemminger, Oliver H. Raftery, Fred M. Koehler, Charles R. Cobb and Charles E. Smith-Sanford. Prickett, Win-ans and Whitney brought the action “on behalf of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Kuly v. White Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Cashion v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Town of Clarksville, Va. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Snowden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.