Legal Opinion

Wright v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1942No. 10016PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In an action by appellant against appel-lees, appellant filed a fourth amended complaint (hereafter called the complaint) which contained two counts. Appellees moved to dismiss the second count. The court heard the motions and, on July 12, 1941, filed a written opinion concluding with the statement that “The motion 1 * * * is granted.” Thereupon, on July 12, 1941, the clerk of the court made a minute entry stating that the motions had theretofore been argued and submitted, and that “The court now files its opinion; and, pursuant thereto, said motions are granted.” On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Sheppy v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Warner Bros. Inc., J. Joseph Bainton, Esquire v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc., and Yun Yon ChoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  3. Cmax, Inc., Also D. B. A. City Messenger of Hollywood and City Messenger Air Express v. Drewry Photocolor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Holdsworth v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  5. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API