Alford v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 60 years confinement.
In his first four points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement of appellant, thereby violating appellant’s rights under the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution, article I, sections 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and articles 1.04, 1.05, 26.04, 26.05, and 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
At a pretrial hearing to determine the admissibility of the videotaped statement,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Poullard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Cotnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.