Legal Opinion

Cotnam v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1991No. CA CR 90-279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

Appellant, Bob Cotnam, Sr., was convicted in a bench trial of defrauding a creditor, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-37-211 (1987). The trial court suspended appellant’s three-year sentence, and ordered him to make restitution to the victim. For reversal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for a directed verdict, and that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to include restitution as a condition of his suspended sentence. We find no merit in either contention, and affirm.

A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Banning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Lovelace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cora v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Crews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API