Connecticut v. Barrett
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
Respondent William Barrett was convicted after a jury trial of sexual assault, unlawful restraint, and possession of a controlled substance. The Connecticut Supreme Court reversed the convictions. It held that incriminating statements made by Barrett should have been suppressed under our decision in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477 (1981), because Barrett, though stating his willingness to speak to police, had indicated that he would not make a written statement outside the presence of counsel. 197 Conn. 50, 495 A. 2d 1044 (1985). We granted certiorari to consider the federal constitutional…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by533 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
528 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.