Michigan v. Jackson
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
In Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477 (1981), we held that an accused person in custody who has “expressed his desire to deal with the police only through counsel, is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police.” Id., at 484-485. In Solem v. Stumes, 465 U. S. 638 (1984), we reiterated that “Edwards established a bright-line rule to safeguard pre-existing rights,” id., at 646: “once a suspect has invoked the right to counsel, any…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,321 opinions
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
1,316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.