Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 16, 1991No. 05-89-01374-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

Following Scott Dwayne Young’s jury conviction for murder, the trial court assessed his punishment at life. On appeal, Young raises three points of error, all complaining that the trial court erred in admitting, before the jury, his written statement. He contends that his statement was inadmissible because it: (1) violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel; (2) was obtained under false pretext and in violation of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination; and (3) had been “massively” edited by the State. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Penley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Lomax v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Buie, Jimmy Donald v. Texas, the State Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  5. Donald Wayne Lindley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API