Legal Opinion

Resure, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1996No. B092972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

Petitioner Resure, Inc., filed a complaint for rescission and declaratory relief against respondents Dan Palmer and Geoffrey Palmer, doing business as G. H. Palmer Associates. The complaint alleged that the Palmers misrepresented material facts or failed to disclose facts concerning potential claims in their application for insurance which would have affected Resure’s decision to underwrite coverage. Resure’s offer to rescind and restore the premiums was stated in the complaint, but not in any notice or letter sent prior to filing it. Resure moved for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. O'GRADY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. La Sound USA, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API