Legal Opinion

Harrah v. Specialty Shops, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1950No. 3613PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Specialty Shops, Inc., respondent, operating a dress shop at Reno, Nevada, under the name of “Magnin’s,” recovered a judgment against John Harrah, appellant, on two causes of action, the' first for $1,877.10 for merchandise furnished his wife, Gloria, from May to September, 1948, and the second for $516.10 for merchandise furnished a subsequent wife, Betty, in December, 1948 and January, 1949. The amended complaint alleged that plaintiff furnished the merchandise, under the first cause of action, to “Gloria C. Harrah, at her request, as defendant’s agent,” and,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stegeman v. VandeventerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Martz v. Selig Dry Goods Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Harrah v. Home Furniture, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fouquette v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. People v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Peterson v. MirandaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kula v. Karat, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API