Legal Opinion

Scott v. Trogdon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1966No. 612PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

“(W)hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329.” Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E. 2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Dunn v. CusterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Coletrane v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Albrecht v. DorsettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API