Legal Opinion

Walston v. Greene

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1957No. 28PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether a verdict should be set aside, otherwise than for error of law, rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Here the trial judge, “being of the opinion that justice and equity” required that he do so, exercised such discretion and set the verdict aside. The record discloses no abuse of discretion; hence, the order is not subject to review on appeal. Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; In re Blair, 230 N.C. 753, 55 S.E. 2d 504; Williams v. Stumpf, 243 N.C. 434, 90 S.E. 2d 688.

The appeal is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Williams v. StumpfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. In Re BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Brown v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API