Legal Opinion

Goldston v. Chambers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1967No. 608-611PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

The orders were signed by the trial judge out of term and out of the district by agreement of the parties, and such action when so authorized is permissible.

In Knowles v. Savage, 140 N.C. 372, 52 S.E. 930, the facts were these:

"The record states that counsel, desiring to leave the court pending the deliberation of the jury, agreed that upon the return of the verdict, the judge could sign judgment ‘out of term.’ That neither of the counsel were present at the rendition of the verdict. The court announced from the bench that it would set the verdict aside if any one was present to make the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Settee v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Shreve v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Justus v. RosnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Beroth Oil Co. v. WhiteheartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API