Legal Opinion

Coletrane v. Christian

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1979No. 7815SC927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff argues in her first assignment of error that when the jury foreman requested an explanation of the law on damages, the trial court inadequately responded to the question. The jury foreman asked in essence whether the jury was bound by amounts given of certain expenses. The trial judge responded:

The jury —the jury puts the amount that —if you feel that the plaintiff is entitled to any amount of damages, it’s the jury’s province to determine that amount. The Court has not instructed you that you are required to return any particular figure. That is your job to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Dixon v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Sherrill v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Howard v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Scott v. TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CusterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Di Frega v. PuglieseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Kor Xiong v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Albrecht v. DorsettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API