Legal Opinion

Schwab-Wilson MacHine Corp. v. Daugherty

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1936No. Civ. 10580PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

Appellant, as petitioner in the court below, sought and obtained a writ of review for the purpose of determining the validity of an order of the respondent Commissioner of Corporations suspending a permit theretofore issued to appellant petitioner, authorizing the sale of stock by the latter. The proceeding was instituted under section 15 of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673, and amendments thereto), which provide that: “Every order, decision, permit or other official act of the commissioner shall be subject to review, • in accordance with the provisions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Dominguez Land Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Lorber v. StorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Dysart v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Hawley v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API