Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1938No. Civ. 10287; Civ. 10288; Civ. 9836; Civ. 9837PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Proceedings in prohibition and certiorari were instituted in the court below for the purpose of reviewing the action of the Board of Dental Examiners in revoking the licenses of certain practitioners, parties hereto. Hearings were had thereon and certain judgments were entered which are here sought to be reviewed on appeal. Since the filing of the briefs the cases of Whitten v. California State Board of Optometry, 8 Cal. (2d) 444 [65 Pac. (2d) 1296], and Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 20 Cal. App. (2d) 76 [66 Pac. (2d) 705], have been rendered by our appellate courts. (See, also,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Schwab-Wilson MacHine Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- MacCracken v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Hignell v. GebalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Nieri v. NieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sparks v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.