Legal Opinion

Lorber v. Storrow

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1937No. Civ. No. 11278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

These two appeals, which by stipulation and order have been consolidated for decision, are prosecuted from judgments entered after demurrers to complaints charging malicious prosecution were sustained without leave to amend, no application having been made in either case for leave to amend. The act complained of in each case was the filing with the state real estate commissioner by respondent of a verified complaint accusing appellants of misconduct which resulted in hearings before the said commissioner.

The question presented is whether or not a proceeding had before the state real estate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sherman v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API