Legal Opinion

Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1942No. L. A. 17578Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Cal.2d 831 (1942)

E. W. LAISNE, Appellant,

v.

THE CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 17578.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 16, 1942.

H. A. Savage and Lawrence W. Young for Appellant.

Morris Lavine, Morse Craig and A. B. Bianchi as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, and Lionel Brown, Thomas I. Coakley, J. Albert Hutchinson and Chas. W. Johnson, Deputies Attorney General, for Respondents.

H. E. Lindersmith, Maurice P. McCaffrey, Forrest M. Hill, Leonard Friedman, Elizabeth Doyle, Glenn V. Walls, Sheldon D. Elliott, Stanley…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited113 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API