Legal Opinion

Dysart v. Daugherty

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1936No. Civ. 11133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

Appellant, who was the petitioner in the trial court, sought a writ of review for the purpose of determining the validity of an order of the Commissioner of Corporations. A general demurrer to the petition was sustained without leave to amend and judgment entered accordingly. This is an appeal from said judgment.

A writ of review will lie only to review the exercise of judicial functions. (Sec. 1068, Code Civ. Proc.) The legislature is without power, in the absence of a constitutional provision authorizing same, to confer judicial functions upon the respondent or any other state-wide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Dominguez Land Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Schwab-Wilson MacHine Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lorber v. StorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Hawley v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API