Legal Opinion
Dominguez Land Corp. v. Daugherty
California Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8528PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The application for a writ of mandate herein presents a companion case to that of Dominguez Land Corp. V. Daugherty, ante, p. 453 [238 Pac. 697], for the reason that while the facts in the two proceedings differ, the same general principles of law are applicable to both. Because of the said differences as to the facts, requiring a somewhat different treatment and application of the legal principles involved in both cases, we have adopted that portion of the opinion of Mr. Presiding Justice Finlayson of the district court of appeal which we deem applicable to the case in its present situation…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.