Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sondheim v. McClain

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

This opinion arises ont of a motion by the board of directors and the secretary of Wallowa Valley Improvement District No. 1, a municipal corporation, for an order amending the peremptory writ of mandamus issued out of this, court on April 15, 1930, in State ex rel. Sondheim, v. McClain et al., 132 Or. 561 (286 P. 590).

Among other things, the writ commands:

“That immediately upon receipt of this peremptory writ of mandamus, you, the above named directors of Wallowa Valley Improvement District No. 1, a municipal corporation, do proceed to make, equalize and apportion an assessment and levy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Noble v. Yancey.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kollock v. BarnardOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Sondheim v. McClainOregon Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of SpokaneOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Griffith v. HanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Montana-Dakota Power Co. v. WeeksDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1934
  5. Biddick v. Laramie Valley Municipal Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API