Griffith v. Hanford
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered by the circuit court after it had sustained a demurrer to the complaint and the plaintiffs had declined to plead further. The demurrer was predicated upon an assertion that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The plaintiffs’ brief says: “This is an action of ejectment.” The defendants’ brief makes a like statement. We are satisfied that the parties have correctly described the nature of the action.
Section 8-203, O. C. L. A., in specifying the required contents of the complaint in an action of ejectment, states:
“The property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Algona Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Steele v. PrebleOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Maney v. DennisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Castro v. GillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Security Savings & Trust Co. v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Windle, Adm'x v. FlinnOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Sponseller v. MeltebekeOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Stotts v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Wright v. Scappoose School District No. IJCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Stotts v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.