Legal Opinion

Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

On March 12,1908, one Chas. H. Gardiner, being the owner of the SW1^ of section 34, T. 4 N., R. 28 E. W. M., entered into a contract in writing with the Hinkle Ditch Company, whereby he purchased the perpetual right to the use of eighty-one miners’ inches of water, measured under six-inch pressure, for irrigation purposes. The contract, in so far as its provisions are pertinent to the present discussion, reads as follows:

“KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the HINKLE DITCH CO., a corporation * * *, first party, in consideration of $810 to it paid by Chas. H. Gardiner of Hermiston, Oregon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Anderson v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Los Angeles Institute for Cancer Research v. Ward MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
  4. Dorsey v. Oregon Motor StagesOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Faught v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API