Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.
On March 12,1908, one Chas. H. Gardiner, being the owner of the SW1^ of section 34, T. 4 N., R. 28 E. W. M., entered into a contract in writing with the Hinkle Ditch Company, whereby he purchased the perpetual right to the use of eighty-one miners’ inches of water, measured under six-inch pressure, for irrigation purposes. The contract, in so far as its provisions are pertinent to the present discussion, reads as follows:
“KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the HINKLE DITCH CO., a corporation * * *, first party, in consideration of $810 to it paid by Chas. H. Gardiner of Hermiston, Oregon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Anderson v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
- Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- West Los Angeles Institute for Cancer Research v. Ward MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
- Dorsey v. Oregon Motor StagesOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Faught v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.