Legal Opinion
Noble v. Yancey.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The demurrer raises the question whether the bonds issued by the Ochoco Irrigation District and now existing are in fact general obligation bonds, or severable only.
The law relating to the organization and operation of irrigation districts, including the issuance and sale of bonds in this state, is contained in Chapter XIV, Or. L., in Section 7305 et seq. Section 7326, Or. L., is as follows:
“Said bonds and the “interest * * and all obligations for the payment of money authorized and incurred under this act, shall be paid by the revenue derived from the annual assessments upon the land in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- American Falls Reservoir District v. ThrallIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Buell v. Jefferson County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. AhoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944
- Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.