Legal Opinion

Biddick v. Laramie Valley Municipal Irrigation District

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1956No. 2739PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiff Ethel Biddick against Laramie Valley Municipal Irrigation District, in which the plaintiff prayed that the court determine what water rights and ditches are owned and held by said district; the proper and lawful basis of levying assessments for current annual expenses of same district; the proper and lawful method of distributing water of the Big Laramie River diverted by means of the so-called Oasis Ditch, and to settle the controversies between the parties. Plaintiff also prayed that the court define the term “irrigable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of SpokaneOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Sondheim v. McClainOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bradshaw v. Milner Low Lift Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API