Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of Astoria
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.
Undenied allegations of the pleadings and a stipulation signed by the parties establish the following facts: The Port of Astoria, whose boundaries are the same as those of Clatsop county, is a municipal corporation organized pursuant to the provisions of sections 65-701 to 65-801, Oregon Code 1930. Pursuant to the provisions of section 65-708, subd. 8, the municipality issued bonds of which $3,670,000 were outstanding January 1, 1932. In December of 1930, when the commissioners of the port prepared its annual budget, showing the amount of tax money needed for the ensuing twelve months, they…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Kinney v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Avery v. JobOregon Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Maricopa County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.