Legal Opinion
Holland v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 17, 2006No. 95-524CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This Winstar-related case is before the Court on plaintiff First Bank’s motion for summary judgment with respect to liability and for partial summary judgment with respect to damages and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment with respect to liability and damages. Plaintiff First Bank (hereinafter “plaintiff’ whenever the term is used in the singular) filed its motion for summary judgment on liability and partial summary judgment on damages (“PL’s Mot.,” docket entry 277) on September 21, 2005. Defendant filed a response to First Bank’s motion…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Grand Acadian, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.