Legal Opinion

Holland v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 20, 2007No. 95-524CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This Winstar-related case is before the Court on plaintiff First Bank’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to damages and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment with respect to damages. Plaintiff First Bank (hereinafter “plaintiff’ whenever the term is used in the singular) filed its motion for summary judgment on liability and partial summary judgment on damages (“Pl.’s Mot.,” docket entry 277) on September 21, 2005. Defendant filed a response to First Bank’s motion and its cross-motion for summary judgment with respect to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Advanced Team Concepts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Sterling Savings Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API