Legal Opinion
Holland v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 20, 2007No. 95-524CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
On November 17, 2006, the Court filed an opinion and order holding the Government liable to plaintiff First Bank for breach of the River Valley I and River Valley II contracts. See Holland v. United States, 74 Fed.Cl. 225, 227-28 (2006). On December 19, 2006, defendant filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s opinion and order (“Def.’s Mot.,” docket entry 340), pursuant to Rule 59(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Pursuant to this Court’s order of December 22,2006, plaintiffs filed an opposition to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Frank Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Heritage of America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.