In Re Disciplinary Action Against Stroble
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Respondent admits the breach of his fiduciary duties and the misappropriation of trust funds totalling approximately $90,000 from three elderly, female clients. At issue is the appropriate discipline that should be imposed. Judge David E. Christensen, serving as Supreme Court referee, recommended disbarment. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility concurs, and additionally seeks $750 in costs. Respondent challenges the recommendation of disbarment and asks, in the alternative, for a two year suspension followed by supervision and full restitution.
I
Neither respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCOYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re Disciplinary Action Against JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against HarriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShoemakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.