Legal Opinion

People v. Ratcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 2008PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), entered March 14, 2007. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that Supreme Court committed a mathematical error in presumptively classifying him at that risk level in accordance with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WindhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. NeuerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. IversonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API