Legal Opinion

People v. Iverson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant was previously classified a level one risk pursuant to SORA, and he contends that the Feople were required to file a petition seeking modification of his risk level pursuant to Correction Law § 168-0 (3). Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see generally People v Windham, 10 NY3d 801 [2008]; People v Charache, 9 NY3d 829, 830 [2007]; People v Daniels, 86 AD3d 921, 922 [2011], lv denied 17…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WindhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. CharacheNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. AskinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. ASKINS, ANDREW J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. BROWNLEE, ERIC, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. MOSS, DWIGHT, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API