Legal Opinion
People v. Windham
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 2008PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
On August 2, 1991, defendant Joseph Windham was sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years for first-degree robbery and 1 to 3 years for first-degree sexual abuse. He was first released on parole on June 25, 1996, but was subsequently reincarcerated in 1997 for a parole violation.
In 2005, defendant appeared before Supreme Court for a sex offender risk level reassessment hearing pursuant to Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [SD NY 1998]), at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. GravinoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- The People v. Quanaparker HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.