Legal Opinion

People v. Neuer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 2011PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was denied due process when the District Attorney’s Office, rather than the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, prepared the risk assessment instrument (see People v Charache, 9 NY3d 829 [2007]; People v McElhearn, 56 AD3d 978, 978-979 [2008], Iv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]).

We agree with defendant that the People failed to establish by the requisite clear and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. CharacheNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. MarreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. DashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API