Legal Opinion
People v. Gardiner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 10, 2012PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1229Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in assessing 30 points against him under risk factor 3, for having three or more victims. Defendant was charged with sexually abusing three children, including his 11-year-old daughter. Although defendant pleaded guilty only to those counts of the indictment relating to the abuse of his daughter, it is well settled that, in determining the number of victims for SORA…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. CallanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. St. JeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PerrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. MenjivarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.