Peters v. Fansteel, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LINDBERG, District Judge.
Defendant, Fansteel, Inc. has filed a motion pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(1) to dismiss plaintiff’s two count complaint for age-discrimination arguing that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is denied as to Count I and granted as to Count II.
For purposes of a motion to dismiss, the court takes the allegations of the complaint as true and all reasonable inferences therefrom and unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mein v. Masonite CorporationIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Marcia E. Stearns v. Consolidated Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Muellner v. Mars, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Frances Husch v. Szabo Food Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- James SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL SCANNING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Ira Iglesia De La Biblia Abierta v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Perez v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020